DOUA STIRI: 1. Nu ma intereseaza dreptul Oliviei Steer la libera exprimare. 2. Amendamentul cu vitamina D a fost respins la Comisia de Buget Finanțe.

Florin Chilian/ februarie 13, 2019/ Blog, Editoriale, Presa/ 3 comments


Nu mă interesează dreptul Oliviei Steer la liberă exprimare. În colonia România acest drept este o tâmpenie oricum. Mă interesează dreptul meu și al tău de a fi informați. Ce facem mai apoi cu această informație ține de fiecare dintre noi, de instinctele noastre de oameni liberi sau de sufletele noastre de slugă. Dreptul meu de a fi informat. Stiu, este o motivatie egoista dar acesta este unicul motiv pentru care am să fiu mereu, necondiționat, alături de Olivia Steer! Haterilor dans!

Amendamentul cu vitamina D a fost respins la Comisia de Buget Finanțe.

Comisia de Buget Finanțe a hotărât respingerea amendamentului propus de Liviu Dragnea privitor la acordarea de vitamina D copiilor din banii tăiați de la servicii.

Acum judecati cu mintile voastre: Despre vitamina D este vorba in materialul video.
A Retired Emergency Room Technician Drops Bombshell “FIu Shot Speech” in Front of CDC Advisory Committee.

A Retired Emergency Room Technician Drops Bombshell “FIu Shot Speech” in Front of CDC Advisory Committee

By

Adam GoldbergPublished on October 31, 2018

On October 25, 2018 a recently retired emergency room technician of 20 years named Lori Ciminelli gave a speech at the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Posted by Courtney Lynn here on Facebook, the video has already garnered 1.2 million views, with over 30,000 comments as of October 31.

She begins by explaining that none of her peers believe in flu shots. She said:

“I don’t come here with any degree. I come here as the public. I’m going to start with a quote by William Wilberforce, and he stated: ‘you can choose to look away, but you can never say you don’t know again.’ I just retired from a local hospital here. No one believes in the flu shots, my colleagues, I didn’t, because the efficacy, and I won’t give you data, you created the data, ten percent one year, eighteen percent the next, forty percent at best.”

She continued to explain that the nasal “flu vaccine,” the infamous “flu mist” also isn’t good for people in her 20 years of experience. The nurse said:

“The flu mist you gave to your children from two to eight years, for almost four years it never worked, three percent, oh well.

I worked in a hospital where my colleagues, doctors, nurses, medical assistants, and patient care lab, we didn’t believe in that flu shot. We were probably at 40 percent and then came our mandates, and then came your (the CDC’s) recommendations.”

(Image credit: Lori Ciminelli / Facebook)

Then, she provided insight into what she was forced to do, to be an emergency room technician while refusing the flu shot. For a while it was customary for people like her or nurses to wear a mask constantly, opt to constantly wear a mask day after day rather than receive the shot.

She continued:

“So you know what, for four years before I retired I put a mask on during 12 hour shifts. It wasn’t easy to breathe, but that’s how much I didn’t believe in your efficacy.

My colleagues didn’t believe in it either, but some of them couldn’t wear that mask for 12 hours. So in the beginning they said ‘I’m just getting a shot, I can’t wear the mask,’ but in the truth, the public’s truth, my observation, which is the first step in scientific theory, they didn’t believe in your shot.

This year, I retired. I’m grateful for that because my soul was sick at what I saw go on. That flu shot was crazy.”

What she’s talking about her “soul being sick at,” it’s real and beyond description. If you’re not familiar with what she’s talking about, only a lot of research could satisfy that question.

The government keeps a record of people who suffer from vaccine injury, it’s called VAERS (vaccine injury reporting system), so if you type in “VAERS injuries flu shot,” or for any vaccine into a search engine, you’ll find exactly what she is speaking of.

(Image credit: vaccineinjuryhelpcenter)

Again she continued:

“You govern globally, in this country. I’m glad I’m retired now, because now I can talk to you, because when I worked I couldn’t, because if I did: conflict of interest, I would have lost my job.

That’s truth: a lot of my colleagues did lose their jobs. I (worked at) one of the few hospitals in this city that allowed us to mask. I can name five hospitals that don’t: goodbye ‘pink slip, no flu shot.’”

To make her experience even more incredible, she never got the flu in seemingly her entire career: while being in contact with people who had it, day in and day out, for such an incredibly long period of time.

(Image credit: Vaxxter)

She continued:

“How did I survive twenty years and never get the flu in that environment? ER, high volume: was I not on the front lines every flu case, 300 people a day every day, every flu case, it was me.

I never had the flu, you know why? I knew how to wash my hands, I knew how to take vitamin D, I knew how to take elderberry syrup.

I don’t approve of your flu shot. Now, you have pharmacists giving it. You bribe us with cards at Target, and you tell us ‘this is free,’ and it’s everywhere. There’s scare tactics that you should be ashamed of. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: he fights for us, he does. He goes to court for us, for our kids who suffered.”

She drew her short yet information packed, 5 minute speech to a close, and her testimony went viral. Do you agree with what she is saying? More research would be great for everybody. Why is a controversial topic controversial?

Share this Post

3 Comments

  1. Ah… dar ce “informare” face “doamna”. Am fost pe grupul dansei si pe cel pro vaccinare si am vazut atatea poze cu copii luate direct de acolo de la mame care spuneau CLAR ca nu au făcut vaccin si regretau iar ele publicau pozele ca reactii la vaccinuri. Stimata Olivia STERGE si iti da block daca anunti civilizat ca nu e ok sa porti poza de pe.un gruo la altul, lasand minciuna.

  2. Bertrand Russell in Impactul științei în societate, 1953:

    “Dieta, injecţiile şi interdicţiile se vor combina, de la vârstă foarte timpurie să producă acel tip de caracter şi tip de credinţe pe care autorităţile îl consideră dezirabil şi orice critică serioasă a puterii va deveni imposibilă psihologic.

    În mod gradat, prin reproducere selectivă, diferenţele congenitale dintre conducători şi conduşi vor creşte până când vor deveni specii aproape diferite. O revoltă a plebei ar deveni la fel de negândită ca şi o insurecţie organizată a oilor împotriva practicii de a mânca carne de oaie.

    “Cred că subiectul cel mai important (politic) este psihologia maselor… Vom arăta că familia împiedică dezvoltarea individului… Deși acestea vor fi studiate în sistemul de educație, ele vor fi aservite obiectivelor clasei guvernante… Populația nu va cunoaște felul în care i se inoculează convingerile. Când tehnica se va fi perfectat, fiecare guvern care a educat generații de oameni în acest fel va putea sa controleze întreaga populație în mod eficient si sigur, fără a fi nevoie de armate sau poliție…

    Propaganda educațională, cu ajutorul guvernului, va putea să obțină rezultate într-o singură generație.

    Exista însă două puternice forțe care se opun unei astfel de politici: una este religia, iar cealaltă este patriotismul… O societate științifică nu poate fi stabilă decât sub conducerea unui guvern mondial.“

    Va exista, în cursul generaţiei următoare sau nu foarte departe de aceasta, o metodă farmacologică de a-i face pe oameni să-si iubească robia, creând dictaturi fără lacrimi, ca să spunem aşa, şi producând un fel de lagăre de concentrare nedureroase pentru societăţi întregi, astfel încât oamenilor le vor fi luate libertăţile, dar le va plăcea, fiindcă vor fi distraşi de la orice dorinţă de a se răscula prin propagandă sau spălarea creierelor, sau prin spălarea creierelor îmbunătăţită prin metode farmacologice. Şi aceasta pare să fie ultima revoluţie”, scria Huxley, autorul cartii Brave New World (1931), în 1956.

    Daca nu-ti este clar, iti dau eu citeva sute de linkuri pe tema asta!

  3. Cine vrea sa ajunga sa stie ceva, orice, trebuie sa aiba inclinatii de autodidact, altfel, e jale mare!

    Michio Kaku: US has the worst educational system known to science
    Traducere: Michio Kaku: SUA are cel mai rău sistem educațional cunoscut științei

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fphPeRvhjQ

    Este valabil pentru tot Vestul, cu universitati “celebre” cu tot, care sint exact Stefan Ghe, pregatind slugi pentru bosi. Si noi am dorit sa avem un astfel de invatamint, dar la cererea noastra, care nu stim pe ce lume ne aflam, dar vrem orice, ca sa avem motive de vaicareala.
    Pink Floyd a spus la ce foloseste invatamintul lor:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR5ApYxkU-U
    Intre 4:02-4:18
    Ai fost vreodata la un doctor care s-a dus intr-o alta camera sa se uite prin carti ca sa afle ce sa-ti spuna?
    Asta este vestul minunat al romanilor unde ploua cu salam si se calca pe parmezan!

Leave a Comment

Adresa ta de email nu va fi publicată. Câmpurile obligatorii sunt marcate cu *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>
*
*